Attorney Suzanne Sayward discusses the importance of updating your estate plan during life’s happy moments, for this edition of our Smart Counsel for Lunch Series. Please watch and if you have any questions or want to learn more please call us at 781 461-1020.
Five Proposed Changes to the Estate and Gift Tax Laws
After the spending spree necessitated by the Coronavirus (think CARES Act, stimulus payments, vaccine development support, etc.), coupled with President’s Biden infrastructure building plans, it is not surprising that Congress has turned its focus toward revenue raising as we emerge from the pandemic. Revenue raising proposals usually mean finding a way to collect more tax dollars. At the end of March, Senators Bernie Sanders and Sheldon Whitehouse introduced a bill they call, “For the 99.5 Percent Act” which proposes sweeping changes to existing estate and gift tax laws. Read on for five of the most significant proposed changes.
- Reduce the current $11.7 million federal ESTATE tax exemption to $3.5 million. For the vast majority of Americans, the federal estate tax (the ‘death tax’) has been a non-issue since 2010 when the exemption was raised to $5 million and indexed for inflation. The exemption is the amount that each person is permitted to pass on free of any federal estate tax at death. Because $5 million was not high enough for some people, the exemption was increased to $11 million under President Trump, albeit with a sunset provision that reduced the exemption back to $5 million at the end of 2025. The Sanders/Whitehouse proposal calls for rolling that exemption back to $3.5 million and indexing it for inflation. While this rollback (if it happens) will mean that more estates will be subject to federal estate tax, the vast majority of estates will not be impacted because most Americans do not have an estate worth more than $3.5 million ($7 million for a married couple). Those folks whose estate is more than the proposed reduced exemption amount should keep an eye on this legislation and explore their options for undertaking some planning before the end of 2021.
- Increase the rate of taxation on federally taxable estates. Under the current federal estate tax law, taxable estates which exceed the exemption are subject to tax at the flat rate of 40%. That means that on a $20 million estate there will be federal estate tax payable of $3,320,000 ($20 million – $11.7 million x .40). Under the Sanders/Whitehouse proposal, the estate tax rate would be increase to 45% for taxable estates valued between $3.5 million and $10 million, 50% for estates over $10 million but less than $50 million, 55% for estates between $50 million and $1 billion, and 65% for estates over $1 billion. While these rates are super high, the number of estates subject to them will be very small.
- Limit total annual exclusion gifts to two-times the amount of the annual exclusion. The annual exclusion amount is the amount that each person may gift to any number of people in any calendar year without having to file a gift tax return and without reducing that person’s lifetime gift tax exemption. In 2021 that amount is $15,000 (a base amount of $10,000 indexed for inflation). For example, under the current law, I can give up to $15,000 to each of my two children, to my seven nieces and nephews, to my two siblings, and to my mailman, if I am so inclined, without any impact on my lifetime gift tax exclusion. There is no limit on the number of people to whom I can gift up to $15,000 in any calendar year. To the extent I give more than $15,000 to any one person in any one calendar year, I will ‘chip-away at’ my lifetime gift tax exemption. For example, if I gave my child $115,000 during the year, I will have made an excess gift of $100,000. This will reduce my lifetime exemption from its current $11.7 million to $11.6 million ($11,700,000 – $100,000 = $11,600,000).Under the proposed law, annual exclusion gifts would be limited to two-times the amount of the annual exclusion. That means that if the annual exclusion amount is $15,000, I could give each of my two children $15,000 in one year but could not give any other gifts in that year without reducing my lifetime gift tax exemption.
- Reduce the current $11.7 million lifetime GIFT tax exemption to $1 million. Under the current federal gift tax law, each person has an $11.7 million lifetime gift tax exemption, which is the amount they can give away during their lifetime before any gift tax must be paid. The proposed law would reduce the gift tax exemption to $1 million, meaning that cumulative excess gifts of more than $1 million during someone’s lifetime will incur gift tax. The reduction of the gift tax annual exclusion amount coupled with the proposal to reduce the federal gift tax exemption from its current $11.7 million to $1 million is likely to significantly curtail estate tax planning in the future if these provisions are enacted, since tax planning done to reduce the size of your taxable estate often involves gifting assets. People who have large estates and who want to undertake planning to reduce their federal estate tax should do so before the end of 2021 in order to take advantage of the current $11.7 million gift tax exemption amount, which will be reduced to $1 million under the new law.
- Limit generation-skipping transfer trusts to a term of 50 years. The generation skipping transfer tax (GSTT) is a tax imposed on transfers to ‘skip’ beneficiaries (think grandchildren). The GSTT is in addition to the federal estate tax and is assessed at the same high rate. In order to mitigate the harshness of the tax, there is an exemption from the GSTT which is currently equal to the amount of the federal estate tax exemption. That means that under the current law a person with an $11.7 million estate could leave his entire estate to his grandchildren and there would not be any GSTT payable. Typical GSTT planning involves creating trusts for multiple generations to shelter family wealth from diminution from the estate tax. In this way, the inheritance from grandpa may escape estate taxation for 100+ years, preserving family wealth for future generations. The Sanders proposal would limit the term of such trusts to 50 years, requiring the payment of estate tax every 50 years.
The above changes are only proposals and we don’t know what the final law will be. The revenue raising plan submitted by President Biden does not contain these provisions so perhaps none of them will be enacted. However, if you have an estate that you anticipate would be subject to federal estate tax if these proposals are enacted, and if you are interested in exploring options for reducing the tax in the event one or more of th`ese proposals become law, you should take action soon.
Attorney Suzanne R. Sayward is a partner with the Dedham law firm of Samuel, Sayward & Baler LLC which focuses on advising its clients in the areas of estate planning, estate settlement and elder law matters. She is certified as an Elder Law Attorney by the National Elder Law Foundation, a private organization whose standards for certification are not regulated by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. This article is not intended to provide legal advice or create or imply an attorney-client relationship. No information contained herein is a substitute for a personal consultation with an attorney. For more information visit our website at www.ssbllc.com or call 781/461-1020.
May, 2021
© 2021 Samuel, Sayward & Baler LLC
What are the tax implications for the sale of your primary residence?
What are the tax implications for the sale of your primary residence?
Attorney Suzanne Sayward explains the tax Implications for the sale of your Primary Residence on today’s episode of Smart Counsel for Lunch. Please watch and if you have any questions or want to learn more please call us at 781 461-1020.
April 2021 Newsletter
News from Samuel, Sayward & Baler LLC for April 2021 includes the articles: 5 Things To Do Soon After A Loved One Passes Away, Delays Continue at the Probate Courts , Ask SSB: Can I disinherit my child?, Obtaining or Refinancing a Mortgage on Property that is Titled in Trust and an update of What’s New at the Firm including a Team Member Spotlight on Caitlin Frantegrossi, a Paralegal at the firm.
Directives as to Remains
A Directive as to Remains sets out a person’s wishes for disposition of their remains at their death. This may include instructions for the type of service to be held, which funeral home to use, the location of a pre-purchased burial plot, or directions for scattering a person’s cremains. Not every person chooses to leave a Directive as to Remains but if your wishes regarding cremation, your funeral, or other disposition instructions are important to you, writing those wishes down and sharing them with your family and the Personal Representative of your Will is the best way to make sure those wishes are followed.
A few things to know about a Directive as to Remains:
- A Directive as to Remains is a stand-alone document – these instructions should not be included in a Will. Wills are often not read until after the funeral at which point it may be too late to carry out your wishes.
- If you are part of a blended family or if you anticipate conflict among family members regarding your final disposition, creating a Directive as to Remains can go a long way toward easing family tensions.
- Leaving a Directive as to Remains can alleviate stress for surviving family members as it relieves them of the burden of having to make decisions about unfamiliar matters at a difficult time.
- The Massachusetts Uniform Probate Code (MUPC) specifically authorizes the person named as the Personal Representative (executor) in the Will to carry out the written instructions of the deceased relating to the disposition of the body, funeral and burial arrangements prior to the official court appointment of the Personal Representative. This is critical since it can take quite a long time (especially these days) to obtain the official court appointment of a Personal Representative.
If you do create a Directive as to Remains, make sure you share a copy of it with the Personal Representative named in your Will and with family members who will be involved in making those final arrangements. A Directive as to Remains is not something everyone chooses to create, but if you have particular wishes regarding the final disposition of your remains, the type of funeral or memorial service you want, or if you have a special place that you want your cremains to be scattered, creating a Directive as to Remains is a good way to ensure your wishes are granted.
Attorney Suzanne R. Sayward is a partner with the Dedham firm of Samuel, Sayward & Baler LLC which focuses on advising its clients in the areas of estate planning, estate and Trust administration, elder law and probate matters. She is certified as an Elder Law Attorney by the National Elder Law Foundation, a private organization whose standards for certification are not regulated by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. This article is not intended to provide legal advice or create or imply an attorney-client relationship. No information contained herein is a substitute for a personal consultation with an attorney. For more information visit www.ssbllc.com or call 781/461-1020.
What is Stepped Up Basis and Why Should You Care
Attorney Suzanne Sayward discusses Stepped Up Basis, for our Smart Counsel for Lunch Series. Please watch and if you have any questions or want to learn more please call us at 781 461-1020.
5 Types of Trusts – How to know which Trust is Right for You
We include a column in our law firm’s quarterly newsletter called ‘Ask SSB’ in which we answer questions posed by readers. Recently, a reader asked about the different types of trusts and which one was right for her. As with most estate planning questions, the answer to, ‘what’s best for me?’ is, ‘it depends.’
There are far more than 5 types of trusts and each type of trust is intended to accomplish different goals. Read on to learn about 5 types of commonly used trusts.
- Revocable Living Trust. A Revocable Living Trust is one of the most common estate planning tools. Reasons for using a Revocable Living Trust include probate avoidance and providing management of assets for beneficiaries (such as young children) who are not yet mature enough to manage assets for themselves or for whom an inheritance should be protected from ‘creditors or predators.’ The basic “players” in any trust are the Grantor (sometimes called the Settlor or Donor), the Trustee and the beneficiary. The Grantor is the person (or persons in the case of a married couple) who creates the Trust. The Trustee is the person (or persons) who is in charge of managing the trust assets, and the beneficiary is the person (or persons) who is entitled to receive distributions from the trust. In a Revocable Living Trust, these three roles are often the same person while the Grantor is alive. For example, if I create a Revocable Living Trust, I am the Grantor. I will name myself as the Trustee of the trust and I will also be entitled to receive distributions from the trust. After the Grantor’s death, a successor Trustee will take over management of the trust assets for the benefit of the successor beneficiaries named by the Grantor to benefit from the Trust assets after the Grantor’s death.
- Testamentary Trust. A Testamentary Trust is a trust created under a Will. A testamentary trust comes into existence only when the testator (person who created the Will), dies and the Will is probated. A Testamentary Trust cannot be used to avoid probate. In fact, a Testamentary Trust requires that any assets allocated to it to be subject to the ongoing jurisdiction of the Probate Court. The primary reason for incorporating a Testamentary Trust into a Will is for long-term care planning purposes. There is a federal regulation that provides that assets funded into a trust via a Will are not deemed to be countable assets in determining whether the surviving spouse of the testator is eligible for Medicaid (MassHealth) benefits to pay for long-term care. Testamentary trust planning is often used for married couples where one person is at heightened risk of needing long-term care.
- Supplemental Needs Trust. A Supplemental Needs Trust is commonly used to preserve needs-based governmental benefits for a person with disabilities. Many benefit programs have an asset limit of $2,000 for eligibility. If someone who receives Supplemental Security Income (SSI), for example, were to receive an inheritance of more than $2,000, they would lose the SSI benefit until the amount in excess of $2,000 is spent down in an allowable manner. Giving the assets away is not an allowable spend down. Transferring excess assets to a first-party Supplemental Needs Trust is an allowable spend down. The downside to this type of Supplemental Needs Trust is that it must provide that Medicaid benefits received by the beneficiary during his lifetime be ‘paid back’ to the state at the beneficiary’s death. With respect to a future inheritance this problem is easily avoided by the creation of a third-party Supplemental Needs Trust. This is a trust created by someone other than the beneficiary. For example, parents of a child with disabilities, can create a third-party trust for the benefit of their child into which the child’s inheritance would be paid at the parents’ deaths. A third-party Supplemental Needs Trust does not need to include a payback provision, and assets in the Trust will not cause the beneficiary to lose needs-based governmental benefits. Assets remaining in the trust at the death of the disabled beneficiary may be distributed to other family members.
- Irrevocable Income Only Trust. An Irrevocable Income Only Trust is often used to preserve assets from having to be spent on future long-term care costs. Given the very high cost of long-term care, many people worry that if they have the misfortune to end up in a nursing home all of their assets will be spent on the cost of their care and they will not be able to preserve any assets for their children. The way this type of trust works is that the Grantor of the trust transfers assets (a house or an investment account, for example) to the trust. The terms of the trust permit only income to be distributed out of the trust to the Grantor during his or her lifetime. The trust must prohibit the distribution of any principal to the Grantor. That means, the grantor cannot receive the transferred assets back. There is a 5-year ineligibility period for long-term care Medicaid benefits following the transfer of assets to this type of trust. After the 5-year period, the assets in the trust are not deemed to be ‘countable’ for purposes of determining the Grantor’s eligibility for Medicaid benefits to pay for nursing home care costs. Be aware that this is easier said than done, as MassHealth, the agency that administers the Medicaid program in Massachusetts, does not view such trusts favorably and looks hard to find ways to invalidate them.
- Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust. In addition to long term care planning, irrevocable trusts are created to reduce estate taxes. There are many types of irrevocable trusts used for estate tax planning: Grantor Retained Annuity Trusts (GRATs), Qualified Personal Residence Trust (QPRTs), Gift Trusts, and Charitable Trusts, to name a few. An Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust (ILIT) is used to remove life insurance from the insured’s taxable estate. Although life insurance is not income taxable, it is a taxable asset for estate tax purposes. While this is less of an issue than it used to be under our former federal estate tax laws (our current federal estate tax law means that only the very wealthiest estates are subject to federal estate tax), estate tax is still an issue for people who live in states like Massachusetts which has its own estate tax system. In Massachusetts, estates in excess of $1 million are subject to estate tax. If someone has assets such as a house, a 401K plan, bank accounts and investments totaling less than $1 million when they pass away, there will not be any Massachusetts estate tax. However, if that person also has a $1 million life insurance policy, then their taxable estate is $2 million and there will be estate tax due to the Commonwealth of $100,000. If the life insurance policy was owned by an Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust, then it would not be included in the taxable estate and the estate tax liability would be eliminated.
The best way to determine the Trust that is best for you and your situation is to consult with an experienced estate planning attorney. If we can help you with that planning, please contact us.
Attorney Suzanne R. Sayward is a partner with the Dedham law firm of Samuel, Sayward & Baler LLC which focuses on advising its clients in the areas of estate planning, estate settlement and elder law matters. She is certified as an Elder Law Attorney by the National Elder Law Foundation, a private organization whose standards for certification are not regulated by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. This article is not intended to provide legal advice or create or imply an attorney-client relationship. No information contained herein is a substitute for a personal consultation with an attorney. For more information visit our website at www.ssbllc.com or call 781/461-1020.
January, 2021
© 2021 Samuel, Sayward & Baler LLC
What are the different kinds of trusts and why does it matter which one I have?
A: As with many seemingly simple estate planning questions, the answer is far from simple. There are many different types of trusts and the trust that is best for you depends on your particular situation and your goals.
For example, if you have a child with disabilities, you will probably need to create a Supplemental Needs Trust, sometimes called a Special Needs Trust, to protect your child’s needs-based governmental benefits. A Supplemental Needs Trust can be a ‘third-party’ trust or a ‘first-party’ trust, and you may need both. A third-party Supplemental Needs Trust can be revocable or irrevocable. The type of Supplemental Needs Trust that is best for you will depend on your circumstances.
If you want to reduce estate taxes payable at your death, there are a number of different types of trusts that may be suitable depending on your circumstances. Some examples include: credit shelter trusts for married couples, an irrevocable life insurance trust (ILIT), a grantor retained annuity trust (GRAT), a qualified personal residence trust (QPRT), or a gift trust, to name a few.
If your goal is to preserve assets from being spent down on future long-term care costs, an irrevocable income only Trust may be appropriate, or maybe a so-called ‘children’s trust’ would be better.
Perhaps you want to avoid probate at your death. A revocable living trust is the most common type of trust for that purpose. Such a Trust is also likely to be an appropriate part of an estate plan for people who have young children or even young adult children.
There are thousands of books with hundreds of pages written about the various types of Trusts that can be used to achieve estate planning goals. The above are just a few examples of these. The best way to determine which type of trust is best for you is to meet with an experienced estate planning attorney to discuss your unique situation and your particular goals.
January 2021 Newletter
News from Samuel, Sayward & Baler LLC for January 2021 includes the articles: 5 Ways in Which the Best Laid (Estate) Plans can go Awry, Possible Tax Changes on the Horizon, What are the different kinds of trusts and why does it matter which one I have?, and an update of What’s New at the Firm including a Welcome to Deb Hayes our new Law Office Administrator and well wishes to Attorney Julia Abbott in the next phase of her legal career.
George Clooney and Gifting
Attorney Suzanne Sayward discusses George Clooney and Gifting and the tax implications, for our Smart Counsel for Lunch Series. Please watch and if you have any questions or want to learn more please call us at 781 461-1020.